Gov. Pete Ricketts on Monday attacked a proposed 1.5% restaurant tax in La Vista, using Twitter to urge the City Council to reject the measure, calling it “bad for families and business!”
“The strength of the economy and existing revenue growth — not new taxes — should fund city hall,” Ricketts wrote in one of two tweets on the tax.
As the @CityofLaVista Mayor said, the city is growing “at a very rapid rate.” The strength of the economy and existing revenue growth - not new taxes - should fund city hall.— Gov. Pete Ricketts (@GovRicketts) July 29, 2019
The proposed restaurant tax, which would apply to many food and drink establishments, could generate up to $700,000 annually, according to La Vista.
La Vista Mayor Doug Kindig said he was disappointed that Ricketts expressed his dissent on social media rather than in a one-on-one phone call.
“Is that how we communicate in this state now with our elected leaders?” Kindig asked.
Kindig said he has invited the governor multiple times to come to La Vista to study the city’s budget, which Kindig said would give Ricketts greater insight into how local municipalities manage growth.
Those meetings were not accepted, Kindig said.
“I thought we had a good enough relationship that he would at least call me and ask me about it,” Kindig said.
Ricketts and Kindig did eventually speak on the phone Monday, Ricketts’ spokesman Taylor Gage wrote in an email.
“During a call earlier today, the governor listened as the mayor expressed his views.
“From day one, the governor has championed the principle that government must live within its means and that it shouldn’t raise taxes on hardworking Nebraskans.”
Kindig largely declined to discuss the specifics of the call. He did say the governor acknowledged that the matter could have been handled differently.
Ricketts, a Republican, is no friend to most tax increases. During the 2019 legislative session, he vetoed a bill that would have created a regional transit service in Omaha with taxing authority.
Ricketts said LB 492 would amount to “an incredible $17 million property tax increase” for Omaha and Douglas County residents and could lead to higher property taxes in Sarpy County communities as well. The Legislature overrode his veto.
Kindig, a Republican, has said the La Vista restaurant tax would help fund infrastructure projects, city services and staffing.
“We do our ... financial planning in a very conservative way, but to grow, we do need funding sources,” Kindig said Monday. “These funding sources are a way to help diversify our tax base for the next generation so we don’t have to rely on property tax.”
Be the first to know when news happens. Get the latest breaking headlines sent straight to your inbox.
The council will consider the tax at 6 p.m. Aug. 20 at La Vista City Hall.
Mcclatchy Washington BuReau WASHINGTON — The Air Force has begun to look at whether there's increased risk for prostate cancer among its fighter pilots. A new investigation by McClatchy shows just how serious the problem may be.
The fighter pilot study was requested by Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein after he was contacted by concerned veterans service organizations in 2018, according to the report obtained by McClatchy.
At the heart of the Air Force study was a question of whether extended exposure in the cockpit to radiation may be linked to increased risk of prostate cancer.
The study found that "pilots have greater environmental exposure to ultraviolet and ionizing radiation … (and fighter pilots) have unique intra-cockpit exposures to non-ionizing radiation." The Air Force study was conducted by the 711th Human Performance Wing at Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio.
The Air Force study found that fighter pilots are no likelier to develop prostate cancer than non pilots. But the Air Force acknowledged the limitations of its review. "Many of the limitations affecting the present study concerned data access and data quality. Capture of cancer cases may have been incomplete," it said.
A separate review by McClatchy of Veterans Health Administration data on prostate cancer among Air Force veterans indicated that the number of Air Force veterans diagnosed with prostate cancer nearly tripled from 2000 to 2018 while that diagnosis for the veteran community at large doubled in the same period. The McClatchy-obtained data did not break out pilots and non pilots.
The Air Force study reported 977 incidents of different types of cancer among the group it reviewed of 4,949 Air Force fighter pilots and 83,483 non-fighter pilot Air Force officers who were commissioned between 1986 and December 2006. An updated analysis in the same Air Force study included Veterans Health Administration data, but it did not change the earlier findings.
Only two prostate cancer cases were found among the fighter pilots in that time frame, which the Air Force acknowledged may not reflect what veteran pilots are seeing in their community.
The fighter pilot community "is a small, tight-knit sub-community," the Air Force said. "Even if the cancer incidence rate in their community is the same as that of the broader (Air Force), it will not be experienced that way."
The numbers in the VA health care system seem to tell a different story.
Based on a Freedom of Information request, McClatchy obtained data on how many cases of prostate cancer were diagnosed or treated through the VA health care system per fiscal year.
McClatchy found that the VA health care system reported 12,123 unique prostate cancer cases for Air Force veterans in fiscal year 2000 and 35,772 unique cases in fiscal year 2018, a 195% increase. A unique case refers to a veteran who is counted only once per fiscal year per cancer regardless of how many medical appointments were made that year to treat the cancer.
Across all military services, prostate cancer treatments doubled from 131,350 in fiscal year 2000 to 266,594 in fiscal year 2018.
One Air Force officer, who spoke to McClatchy on condition of anonymity, said the results of the Air Force study could reflect the limitations of the review: the age group was mostly airmen in their 20s to 40s and the review was based on their active duty medical records, where prostate cancer may not yet have surfaced.
The fighter pilot group may also be less likely to use VA health care after leaving the military, because they often go on to fly for commercial airlines and use the company's health care plan, so the Air Force did not have access to those records.
The study's reach was also limited by the fact that very few airmen stayed in the service long enough to fully track the cancer, which is most common in men in their 60s.
"We are considering further studies," the Air Force official said.
The Air Force study had intended to include Navy and Marine Corps pilots but could not get a comparable population, the Air Force official said.
The University of Alabama and Clemson University clearly stand today at the pinnacle of college football, having split the last four national championships.
But the schools also share another distinction in college athletics: massive teams of women’s rowers.
In 2018, Alabama reported to the federal government that it had 120 women participating in the sport. Clemson had a rowing team of 104.
Those schools don’t even have the largest rowing squads, and they also aren’t alone. An examination of athletic participation data suggests many big-time football schools are sporting large rowing rosters, which can help them stay in compliance with the federal gender equity law known as Title IX.
Michigan reported 132 women’s rowers in 2018. The figures were 110 at Ohio State, 101 at Texas and 93 at Oklahoma. Iowa had a sizable squad at 91. But no school could rival Wisconsin and its eye-popping roster of 176 — almost triple the size of the average NCAA squad.
Women’s athletics advocates say the schools’ outsize rowing teams bear scrutiny under Title IX.
In most cases, the rosters are inflated by large numbers of novice rowers — women recruited from the general student body to give the sport a try. As long as those rookies are still on the roster by the time of the team’s first competition, the schools can officially count them as female athletes.
Advocates say the teams are so large they leave many of the women with little real opportunity to compete, denying women a true athletic opportunity.
“Whenever women’s teams or programs are treated differently in this way, such as padding women’s teams with athletes who will never participate, or having women athletes participate in nonvarsity ways like novice rowing, that is sex discrimination,” said Kristen Galles, an attorney who has litigated Title IX cases.
She said that if the schools are truly committed to women’s athletic participation, they would add a women’s team in a new sport rather than padding their rowing rosters.
But schools with women’s rowing tout their novice programs as a way for women athletes who weren’t exposed to the sport in high school to compete at the Division I level.
“All across America, varsity rowing programs take in what we here at Iowa call ‘talent transfer’ athletes,” an Iowa rowing coach says in an online appeal looking for women to join the team. “No rowing experience is necessary!”
College rowing a half-century ago was seen by many as a stuffy Ivy League sport, the province of schools like Yale, Princeton, Penn and Brown. Many schools called it by another name — crew.
But today, you can find women’s rowing teams at Kansas State, Washington State, West Virginia and in Omaha at Creighton University. And it’s largely in response to Title IX, the landmark 1972 law barring colleges and universities from discriminating against women in any program, including athletics.
While there are several ways universities can comply with Title IX’s requirement of providing equitable athletic opportunities for women, one of the most common is for schools to seek to balance women’s enrollment and athletic participation. If 52% of a school’s enrolled students are women and 52% of athletes are, too, that meets the test.
The U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights, charged with enforcing Title IX, requires schools each year to report figures on athletic participation for men and women. While the numbers reported might not directly match what schools consider their official figures for Title IX compliance, the data does provide a window into their athletic gender balance.
Those figures make clear that as many major universities have sought to balance the athletic playing field for men and women, they have turned to women’s rowing in a big way.
Between 1990 and 2018, the number of Division I women’s rowing teams grew from 21 to 88. Over that same period, the overall number of participants in the sport increased eightfold, from 672 to 5,500 — in that time the fastest growth of any collegiate sport.
Rosters are also expanding. The average women’s squad size in 2018 was 63, almost double the average in 1990.
While the NCAA sanctions rowing for both men and women, there are nearly three times as many women’s teams as men’s teams, and the women’s rosters on average are almost 40% larger than the men’s. Wisconsin’s 176-member women’s squad in 2018 was more than double the size of it’s men’s squad of 80.
For college athletic departments, the biggest appeal of women’s rowing can be found in the numbers.
In a typical varsity rowing meet — called a regatta — each team might field three eight-rower boats and two four-rower boats, with a coxswain in each boat to steer and bark the cadence. That’s roughly three-dozen competitors. Add in some novice competitors, and the number can go above 50.
Compare that to women’s basketball, with an average roster of 15 players and perhaps 10 appearing in a game. Rowing provides an athletic department some big numbers toward balancing gender equity.
Most of the largest rowing rosters can be found at football schools, a trend that’s most likely explained by the added difficulty football schools face in achieving gender balance. Football often involves even larger rosters, averaging 121 players at the game’s highest level. And there is no corresponding women’s sport to balance against it.
“You can’t ever match the football numbers, but rowing is the sport that can bring in the most participants on the women’s side,” said a former athletic director who worked at schools with rowing, speaking on the condition he not be named.
The schools with the largest rosters also typically have novice rowing programs, with the schools putting out invitations to women to come out for open tryouts.
“I know, you might be thinking, ‘You’re inviting me out for a Division I tryout in a sport I’ve never done?’ That’s exactly what we’re doing,” Iowa assistant rowing coach Jeff Garbutt says in an appeal for rowers on the school’s website.
Similar appeals are made at other schools, with coaches at Minnesota and Indiana handing out flyers on campus in the search for women who might be willing to give the sport a try. According to an NCAA report on the practice, the coaches ideally look for athletic women 5-foot-10 and above to row and 5-foot-3 and below to serve as coxswains.
While tryouts are open to anyone, that’s not to suggest the sport is easy. Rowing can be the most grueling of any NCAA sport, with a typical 2,000-meter race requiring more than six minutes of all-out exertion.
Garbutt said in his online pitch that even newcomers to the sport can sometimes excel. He said two-thirds of the U.S. Olympic rowing team started as college walk-ons. Ohio State has said 12 of the 25 athletes who rowed on the school’s 2016 NCAA runner-up team started on the school’s novice team.
But given the number of rowers some schools report, it’s doubtful that many will ever see a meaningful opportunity to compete on the varsity level. In fact, it appears that many of the women counted as rowers are only briefly on the team and some never set foot in a boat at all.
U.S. Department of Education guidelines call for participant counts to be recorded based on the team size at the time of the first competition. For most rowing teams, that’s during the fall.
However, rowing season doesn’t really kick into gear until the spring. By that time, it appears that there’s usually been a considerable shaking-out of novice rowers. At some schools, the number of rowers ultimately listed on their official online rosters is about half the numbers they report to the U.S. Department of Education.
“Everybody has attrition, especially in rowing when you recruit a lot of women on campus who give it a try and find, ‘This is too much work,’ or ‘I’m not good enough,’ ” the former athletic director said.
As an example of how rowing rosters shake out, during the 2017-18 season, Alabama reported that it had 120 women’s rowers. But its race results show that only about 82 in the end competed in a varsity or novice race, suggesting that 38 did not compete at all.
And 22 of the 82 rowers who did compete for Alabama took part in only a few early season races, usually as novice competitors, and then appeared to drop off the roster.
This suggests that about half the 120 Alabama rowers saw no or very limited novice action. That’s also supported by the school’s online roster, which had 57 names on it at season’s end.
Iowa showed similar attrition. Of 91 rowers reported at the start of the season, it appears that 18 never competed in a race, and 18 others disappeared from competition after the second meet and weren’t on the official roster. That meant about 40% of Iowa’s reported rowers saw no or very limited action.
Iowa and Alabama officials did not answer questions about their rowing programs.
But a deeper look at Alabama’s Title IX data dramatically shows the impact of such big rosters. The school that has won five national football titles in the past decade stands as a poster child for how rowing can reshape a school’s gender balance.
In 2006, women represented only 38% of athletes at Alabama, even though women made up 53% of the total student body.
But when the school in 2007 elevated its club rowing team to the varsity level, adding 65 women to its athletic department, the school’s athletic participation rate for women shot up to 46%.
Then in 2015, when Alabama in a single year added more than 50 rowers to reach a peak squad of 128, women suddenly represented 53% of Crimson Tide athletes.
Through the addition of a single sport, Alabama’s sizable gender gap was largely erased.
It’s unclear whether such big rowing rosters have ever been put under a Title IX microscope. Enforcement of Title IX is complaint-driven. However, some Title IX advocates question whether the big rosters would stand up to such scrutiny.
“They can’t inflate the women’s numbers beyond what’s reasonable,” said Donna Lopiano, a former college athletic director who consults with schools and testifies in court on Title IX.
Lopiano and Galles also questioned whether the novice programs run afoul of Title IX regulations that require that male and female athletes compete on the same level.
Novice athletes don’t participate as fully as a regular varsity athlete, Galles said. If there is true athletic parity, where are the novice programs for men?
“Those are not varsity rowers,” Galles said of the novices. “They are like B, C and D teams from junior high.”
For the record, Creighton in 2018 reported a comparatively modest 52 rowers, below the NCAA average and not substantially more than compete in regattas.
Still, the roster is the largest of any Creighton sport and plays a role in keeping the school’s athletic gender numbers in balance. Without it, the school would be short of matching athletic participation and women’s enrollment.
Nebraska is one of six schools in the 14-team Big Ten that does not sponsor intercollegiate women’s rowing. It offers only club rowing teams for both men and women.
But Husker Athletic Director Bill Moos is certainly aware of the sport and its big rosters. Moos was previously athletic director at Washington State, which in 2018 reported 96 women’s rowers — the eighth-largest team in the sport.
“When you see the schools that offer women’s rowing, do the numbers on that sometime,” Moos said during a recent interview about Nebraska’s Title IX compliance.
But he also said the sport does fill a void, allowing women who were perhaps good basketball or volleyball players in high school the chance to go on to compete in college.
Moos believes his school is in compliance with Title IX, and it doesn’t appear that anyone at the university is floating the idea of adding women’s rowing. However, last year Nebraska was still about 30 women’s athletes short of complete parity with women’s enrollment.
If the five-time national football champion school ever did decide to join other traditional football powers and create even an average-sized women’s rowing team, it would likely blow any lingering athletic gender gap out of the water.