ORLANDO, Fla. (AP) — Legal wrangling has surrounded the U.S. Census count for decades, culminating in this year's fight over adding a citizenship question.

Most challenges have centered on correcting mistakes counting underrepresented populations such as minorities in the official census, which determines how many congressional seats each state gets and how hundreds of billions of federal dollars are distributed.

"The census is a bureaucratic instrument which is supposed to function neutrally, but numbers are always political in any kind of refashioning of the population for political purposes," said Sarah Igo, a history professor at Vanderbilt University.

For the first half of the 20th century, the federal courts deliberately avoided cases involving reapportionment of congressional seats, according to historian Margo Anderson, who wrote the book "The American Census: A Social History." Judges largely left such decisions in the hands of state legislatures.

That changed in 1962 when the U.S. Supreme Court took up a Tennessee case and issued a landmark ruling that federal courts could hear redistricting cases. The case produced the "one person, one vote" standard for ensuring fair representation in legislative redistricting.

By the early 1960s, improvements in survey techniques and data processing allowed the U.S. Census Bureau to see which populations were being undercounted.

"The capacity to measure census accuracy, to know whether you are doing a good job or not, really dates to the second half of the 20th century," Anderson said in an interview Tuesday.

Combined with the Supreme Court's new standard, those technical improvements opened the door for a series of federal lawsuits after the 1970 Census claiming that non-English speakers in cities were being overlooked.

Those lawsuits were dismissed, but the fight over how to count accurately was just warming up.

What makes the current litigation over whether to add a citizenship question to the census unusual is how close it's taking place to the 2020 count in the spring. The Supreme Court recently blocked the question "Are you a citizen of the United States?" at least temporarily, saying the Trump administration's justification "seems to have been contrived."

President Donald Trump has vowed to push forward with it. However, a federal judge on Wednesday rejected the Justice Department's bid to swap attorneys working the case, the second judge to do so in as many days.

"The real issue isn't just the litigation," Anderson said. "It's that we're very late in the game."

This report includes material from the Hill news site.

Commenting is limited to Omaha World-Herald subscribers. To sign up, click here.

If you're already a subscriber and need to activate your access or log in, click here.

Load comments

You must be a full digital subscriber to read this article You must be a digital subscriber to view this article.