Posted: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 12:00 am
An appellate court was sharply divided Tuesday on whether an Omaha man should receive a new trial based on a faulty transcript — one that originally listed 13 jurors as deliberating in the case.
In a 2-1 decision, the Nebraska Court of Appeals upheld the conviction of Omaha resident Charles E. Kays on a charge of sexual assault of a child.
Copyright ©2014 Omaha World-Herald. All rights reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, displayed or redistributed for any purpose without permission from the Omaha World-Herald.
To purchase rights to republish this article, please contact The World-Herald Store.
Wednesday, October 16, 2013 12:00 am.