SAN FRANCISCO — It’s becoming a familiar scene — luxury shuttles with Wi-Fi and plush seats barreling past sluggish, dilapidated city buses crammed with local residents standing elbow to elbow.
The nerd convoy, ferrying workers to technology companies in Silicon Valley, has raised the ire of civic activists who see it as a symbol of a divide between the haves and have-nots as the region’s tech boom has sent housing costs and evictions soaring.
But as heated as that backlash has become at times, it has obscured a much broader story that these buses have to tell about changes sweeping across the Bay Area.
Tech giants are building massive new headquarters to the south of this city in communities with no ability or desire to create additional housing. With the region’s public transportation systems unable to keep pace with this growth, the tech boom has led to a private transportation boom.
Tech companies are spending tens of millions of dollars on hundreds of shuttles that transport thousands of increasingly far-flung employees to their Silicon Valley offices.
For tech companies, the shuttles are key to competing for talent. And they are part of broader, environmentally focused efforts to get employees out of their cars and into traffic-reduction programs often required by local communities as a condition for approving expansions.
Yet critics are questioning whether this ad hoc system is the best way to solve the region’s transportation woes. Some argue the private mass transit system is taking money away from public transportation while enabling municipalities in Silicon Valley to greenlight major tech expansions without building housing.
San Francisco, increasingly attractive to the young workers tech companies covet, can expect to see more of these shuttles barreling down its streets in the coming years, the critics say.
“I assume these companies were well-intentioned when they designed these programs,” said Susan Shaheen, co-director of the transportation sustainability research center at the University of California-Berkeley. “But this is what happens when something scales. The impact is very different.”
Just about every major tech company in Silicon Valley now operates its own shuttle fleet, both long-haul buses that take riders from San Francisco, Oakland or Marin to Silicon Valley, and short-haul shuttles that pick up employees at train stations and carry them the last few miles to work.
By far the largest fleet is operated by Google Inc., which runs about 100 buses on 40 routes across the Bay Area. The buses carry about 4,000 passengers a day from seven Bay Area counties.
In an effort to get employees out of cars, Google’s transportation program now includes the largest electric corporate car-sharing program in the country as well as an on-demand taxi service and bikes for getting around the Googleplex.
But as Google’s workforce has ballooned, the shuttle service has grown as large as the fixed-route suburban bus service of the Central Contra Costa Transit Authority. Biodiesel shuttle buses are free for employees.
Nathalie Criou of San Francisco loved riding the Google bus so much that after she left, she decided to create a Google bus “for the rest of us.”
In 2011, the former Google product manager launched RidePal, a startup that provides shuttle services for smaller Silicon Valley companies that can’t afford their own fleet or for technology workers looking for an easier way to get to work.
“If Google can do it, then it should be possible to do it for everyone else,” she said.The reality is that there aren’t many options even for folks who want to live closer to work.
The communities in which the companies are expanding — Cupertino, Mountain View and Menlo Park — have not built housing to match these expansions. Yet in many cases, municipalities are limiting the amount of parking that can be built and have required companies to reduce the number of car trips.
“Some in San Francisco believe that if the buses weren’t here, these people would just live in Silicon Valley,” said Adrian Covert, a policy manager for the Bay Area Council. “But that’s wrong. Silicon Valley’s voters and NIMBYs have been very effective in enforcing no-growth policies, to the point that there’s literally no vacant rentals left to move into.”