Motorists tap brakes on installing insurers’ data devices

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Sunday, September 22, 2013 12:00 am

To hear Progressive Corp. Chief Executive Glenn Renwick tell it, insurance telematics seem to have hit a speed bump.

When the carrier asked motorists if they’d be willing to install a device that would monitor their driving in exchange for potential discounts of up to 30 percent, about 40 percent of survey takers said “no way,” Renwick recounted during a recent conference call with analysts.

This year’s disclosures that the National Security Agency routinely violated privacy protections for years haven’t helped sell people on the what insurers see as the benefits of telematics, such as making insurance pricing more accurate.

In only one year, the percentage of telematics executives who believe that such programs will become widely adopted in the next three years has fallen to 22 percent from 30 percent, Joe Reifel, an AT Kearney partner, said at a telematics conference in Chicago this month.

“Actual adoption is a little on the challenging side,” said Deloitte Director Andrew Goldberg.

Most major U.S. insurers currently offer usage-based insurance programs, which track habits such as braking and mileage. Worldwide, subscriptions for driving-monitoring gadgets and apps are expected to grow from nearly 6 million at the end of 2013 to 107 million in 2018, connectivity trends forecaster ABI Research said in June.

Still, there are challenges to participation, mainly related to privacy concerns.

Participation is increasing but “people are scared” and confused, said Theodore Poulos, insurance specialist for the Leech-Bridges Inc. agency in Zion, Ill. So far, about 3 percent of clients have signed up.

“This is not a GPS device,” Poulos said at the Telematics Update conference. He said consumers’ key concern is the device will track their location. “We have to educate the consumer.”

Pinnacle Actuarial Resources Inc. shared results at the conference of an analysis of about 2,000 sentiments expressed on Twitter about Progressive’s Snapshot telematics device over a recent 10-month period.

People not using Snapshot were the most negative. Their biggest concern was privacy, particularly the belief insurers might track their locations despite assurances the technology monitors only mileage, braking and other driving habits.

The tweets were nearly evenly split between people who weren’t using Snapshot and those who were in various stages of using it. In tone, 55 percent were negative, 26 percent were positive and 19 percent were neutral.

“There’s still an inherent distrust of insurance companies,” said Roosevelt Mosley, a principal at Pinnacle. While telematics have “definite long-term potential,” carriers need to address concerns, Mosley said.

Mosley shared this tweet: “I’m waiting for someone to leak documents showing the NSA can track people with the Progressive Snapshot thing.”

Also deterring consumers is the fear devices such as Snapshot will cause rates to rise if their bad driving habits are discovered. Frequent hard braking, for example, can hurt a person’s chances of getting a big discount because it suggests careless driving.

Besides braking habits, the discount for Progressive Snapshot users is also influenced by how many miles are logged each day and how often policyholders drive between midnight and 4 a.m. Generally, savings are greater the less mileage people rack up, and the fewer number of times they drive in the wee hours, which is a more dangerous time to be on the road.

Progressive and other insurers, however, have assured policyholders that the devices won’t be used to penalize them, only to reward good driving behaviors.

Progressive, whose telematics efforts date to 1999, has said that 1.6 million policyholders have enrolled in its usage-based insurance program. That represents more than 10 percent of the policies on the books of the Mayfield Village, Ohio-based company. It says it has seen evidence that people who use the device have fewer and less severe accidents, which in turn reduces its claims costs.

Still, the company is “trying to find the message that actually moves the needle” in increasing participation, Renwick said. “We now understand how significant a burden it is to try to educate consumers to do something” that isn’t part of the “natural buying” process.

Copyright ©2014 Omaha World-Herald. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, displayed or redistributed for any purpose without permission from the Omaha World-Herald. To purchase rights to republish this article, please contact The World-Herald Store.



Inside Business
To submit an announcement for "Inside Business", click here. For questions call (402) 444-1371 or e-mail

World-Herald Alerts

Want to get World-Herald stories sent directly to your home or work computer? Sign up for's News Alerts and you will receive e-mails with the day's top stories.