WASHINGTON (AP) — Christine Kwapnoski hasn’t done too badly in nearly 25 years in the Walmart family, now making more than $60,000 a year in a job she enjoys most days.
But Kwapnoski says she faced obstacles at Walmart-owned Sam’s Club stores in both Missouri and California: men making more than women and getting promoted faster.
She never heard a supervisor tell a man, as she says one told her, to “doll up” or “blow the cobwebs off” her makeup.
Once she got over the fear that she might be fired, she joined what has turned into the largest job discrimination lawsuit ever.
The 46-year-old single mother of two, the assistant manager in her store’s groceries and produce sections, is one of the named plaintiffs in a suit that will be argued at the Supreme Court on Tuesday. At stake is whether the suit can go forward as a class action that could involve 500,000 to 1.6 million women, according to varying estimates, and potentially could cost the world’s largest retailer billions of dollars.
But the case’s potential importance goes well beyond the Walmart dispute, as evidenced by more than two dozen briefs filed by business interests on Walmart’s side and civil rights, consumer and union groups on the other.
The question is crucial to the viability of discrimination claims, which become powerful vehicles to force change when they are presented together as class actions instead of individually. Class actions increase pressure on businesses to settle suits because of the cost of defending them and the potential for very large judgments.
Columbia University law professor John Coffee said that the high court, depending on how it decides the Walmart case, could bring a virtual end to employment discrimination class actions filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
“Litigation brought by individuals under Title VII is just too costly,” Coffee said. “It’s either class action or nothing.”
Illustrating the value of class actions, Brad Seligman, the California-based lawyer who filed the lawsuit 10 years ago, said the average salary for a woman at Walmart was $13,000, about $1,100 less than the average for a man, when the case began.
“That’s hugely significant if you’re making $13,000 a year, but not enough to hire a lawyer and bring a case.”
The company has fought the suit every step of the way, Seligman said, because it is the “biggest litigation threat Walmart has ever faced.”
A trial judge and the federal appeals court in San Francisco, over a fierce dissent, said the suit could go forward.
But Walmart wants the high court to stop the suit in its tracks. The company argues it includes too many women with too many different positions in its 3,400 U.S. stores. Walmart says its policies prohibit discrimination and that most management decisions are made at the store and regional levels, not at its Bentonville, Ark., headquarters.
Theodore J. Boutrous, Walmart’s California-based lawyer, said there is no evidence that women are poorly treated at Walmart. “The evidence is the contrary of that,” Boutrous said.
The company is not conceding that any woman has faced discrimination but says that if any allegations are proven, they are isolated. “People will make errors,” said Gisel Ruiz, Walmart’s executive vice president for people, as the company calls its human resources unit.
Ruiz paints a very different picture of the opportunities offered women at Walmart.
“In less than four years, I went from an assistant manager trainee to running my own store,” she said. “I’m one of thousands of women who have had a positive experience at Walmart.”
Kwapnoski, who works at the Sam’s Club in Concord, Calif., is one of two women who continue to work at Walmart while playing a prominent role in the suit. The other is Betty Dukes, a greeter at the Walmart in Pittsburg, Calif.
“It’s very hard for anyone to understand how difficult that is and what courage that is,” Seligman said of Kwapnoski and Dukes. “They’re Public Enemy No. 1 at Walmart.”
The suit, citing what are now dated figures from 2001, contends that women are grossly underrepresented among managers, holding just 14 percent of store manager positions. Walmart responds that women in its retail stores made up two-thirds of all employees and two-thirds of all managers in 2001.
Kwapnoski said she has seen some changes at Walmart since the suit was filed. The company now posts all its openings electronically so everyone knows what positions are open.
Kwapnoski said she and a lot of women were promoted into management just after the suit was filed. Now, she said, promotions are back to the way they were before, favoring men.
She said she’s hoping the court fight will force Walmart to recognize that women are not valued as much as men are and that her bosses will begin to “make sure that good men and good women are being promoted, not just men.”
Copyright ©2012 Omaha World-Herald®. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, displayed or redistributed for any purpose without permission from the Omaha World-Herald.
