Today’s e-Edition

e edition

Metro Guide Online

Find a business

Category:
Location:


Zip Code:
Within  Miles of Zipcode

Shatel: Green doesn't crash the car, but it still sputters

Column by Tom Shatel
WORLD-HERALD SPORTS COLUMNIST

WACO, Texas — It was the perfect day to take the new quarterback out for a spin, training wheels and all.

Perfect? There was not a cloud in the wide Texas sky, the thermometer was wearing short sleeves and there was plenty of room in Floyd Casey Stadium to stretch out and take a little snooze.

It was a Nebraska Retro Day at Baylor's Bear Den. With a sparse and lethargic home crowd, Big Red fans filled up three large sections and there was enough red everywhere else to make it look and sound like one of those Nebraska home games at Kansas or Kansas State in the 1980s and '90s.

There could not have been a better scenario for the Cody Green Era to begin at Nebraska. Baylor is the ideal road venue for a freshman to take his first snaps as a starting quarterback. Half-empty stadium. Lots of NU fans cheering him on, but not 80,000 of them putting the heat on at home.

OK, it could have been better. It got better. Before Green even took the field, he was the beneficiary of a 7-0 lead, thanks to a blocked punt returned for a touchdown.

Perfect timing.

Less than perfect start.

Except for that final result: Nebraska 20, Baylor 10.

The Huskers ended a two-game losing string, moved to 5-3 and 2-2 in the Big 12 and climbed back into the thick of the Big 12 North turtle sprint. For that reason alone, it was a brilliant introduction by No. 17.

And make no mistake: The Green Era has begun. Green is the man. He is the future.

The future arrived on Saturday, but it lacked the theater of, say, Tommie Frazier leaping over the goal line at Missouri in 1992 or Turner Gill crashing out of a phone booth to save the day against Auburn in 1981. The common thread would be that Frazier, Gill and Green all were pressed into duty at a young age to give an offense and a season a jump-start.

That doesn't mean we're saving a spot on Mount Rushmore for Green. But, like Gill and Frazier, Green did something very important in his debut: He didn't crash the car.

Well, he tried at times. Green made good plays for both Nebraska and Baylor. He showed sparks, and he offered rough spots. He threw a doozy of a deep ball to Niles Paul, a 45-yard spiral to the Baylor 1-yard line that set up NU's only offensive touchdown.

He threw a pick-six that energized the wrong team and gave BU hope for a second-half comeback.

It never happened, because Nebraska's defense is the best friend a young quarterback can have. Bo Pelini has a 10-2 defense.

Unfortunately, he's got a 5-7 offense.

Can Green change that? On Saturday, he offered both hope and reality. He doesn't look ready to dent Oklahoma's defense. Can he outscore Todd Reesing at Kansas? He doesn't look close to that yet.

Can he lead Nebraska to wins over Kansas State and Colorado? That's a more likely scenario.

Some of this will be how much rope offensive coordinator Shawn Watson gives him, how much trust Green earns through poise and execution and play-making. But that's a two-way street. Watson needs to put his young colt into position to run.

Watson's words and actions on Saturday gave this suggestion: Don't expect miracles this season.

He spent the day on the sideline to hold Green's hand. He talked about “rough spots'' and said, “We're going to have to keep the training wheels on for a while.”

“We didn't ask him to do much,'' Watson said. “We just asked him to kind of manage us. Just a young guy, first time.''

Green's interception came on a quick flat pass across the field, and Clifton Odom easily stepped in front and picked it. Later, in the fourth quarter, after NU had recovered a fumble deep in Baylor territory, Green fumbled it right back.

“He had the one pick, and we have to get that fixed,'' Watson said. “He just didn't see the coverage for what it was. They had come up and bluffed. He thought it was blitz, and it was not a blitz.''

Then there was the zone-read. Watson said he went with Green over Zac Lee because Green gives NU another running threat. Green ran eight times for 43 yards. But Green didn't have an attempt on a zone-read. The Huskers ran a handful, and each time Green handed off.

Why? Green said “the zone read wasn't really in our game plan.'' Watson said it was because the defensive end took away Green and gave NU the running back.

Given NU's choppy situation at running back, that may not be the last time. But Green looked good on draw plays or other times he took the ball and galloped through defenders. The challenge now is to get him loose; zone read, bootleg, whatever.

“We wanted him to run eight or 10 times,'' Watson said. “We had a lot more called, but they took it away from us.

“We've just got to find the things he does well and what he's comfortable with and put him in those situations.''

What it means is that it's Nov. 1 and the Huskers are starting all over at quarterback. This bodes well for Green getting experience for 2010. But how much of 2009 can he revive?

So far, he's 1-0. That's called a good start.

Contact the writer: 444-1025, tom.shatel@owh.com


Contact the Omaha World-Herald newsroom


Copyright ©2009 Omaha World-Herald®. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, displayed or redistributed for any purpose without permission from the Omaha World-Herald.

14 Comments

Posted by: 1audiofile on 11/01/09 @ 12:21 am:

Not losing is a great start. The offense did score 13 points. Which would have been enough to win the Iowa State game, just sayin.

He completed over 50% of his passes, which is better than 33% of his passes.

He also ran well and averaged about 5 yards per carry. I find it hard to believe they cannot get him into more running situations. Defenses have tried to box our QBs in the past and failed. Pull out some tapes or "talk to the man".

Posted by: 2791BMIKE on 11/01/09 @ 6:41 am:

Hey Tom - would love to see you and the other Nebraska sportswriters take the o-line to task a bit more for the lack of running game and overall offensive production. It doesn't matter how good our skill players in the backfield are - no pocket / no running lanes, no offense. And right now the offensive line doesn't look any better than the Callahan era, and that has to change if this program is to turn the corner

Posted by: Masshusker on 11/01/09 @ 7:14 am:

Did we put things under wraps the second half to not lose? Or did Baylor get better? My perspective is that we got 20 points, coaches thought that was enough to win and we sat on the ball. A pick 6 and we almost lose but didn't, that's HUGE! Look for more of the same vs OU. Predicted score: OU 24, NU 10.

Posted by: jl on 11/01/09 @ 7:49 am:

Come on folks, without the big uglys in the front line everything else is a scramble. Green did fine. But we have serious problems up front, very serious problems. For those of you who jump up and down over those high profile players, don't jump too high and too often. Gill and Frazier had good offensive lines. Obviously, Cody Green does not.

Posted by: ejej121@msn.com on 11/01/09 @ 8:16 am:

Huskers have injured running backs, receivers that lack toughness and aggression, and two capable QBs. Green just gives an extra threat that Lee can't deliver. Its never going to be a route with this group.

Posted by: Jeff on 11/01/09 @ 9:04 am:

A win is a win. However, based on what I witnessed against Baylor, the Huskers will need to improve 10-fold on offense, regardless of who is at quarterback, to become bowl eligible (6 wins). Kent State (yes I said Kent State) put up over 400 yards on Baylor. I'll keep on a cheerin' GBR!

Posted by: mark Schwenke on 11/01/09 @ 9:39 am:

Green did a great job and Watson continues to prove that HE is the PROBLEM. The play calling by watson continues to be painful to watch. Isn't he the same moron who didn't identify that Ganz was a better QB than Keller and fans had to sit through misery until the Texas game a couple of years ago? Green is the answer and Watson needs to go. Bo better get a clue. Where was the spread offense that could allow Green to drop back read and then RUN? Just like Texas designed for Vince Young, Remember? I read somewhere that Green now knows 270 plays from the watson playbook. 270? What? Sounds like bill callahan to me all over again.

Posted by: Padonjr@aol.com on 11/01/09 @ 10:34 am:

Tom, We hear that the team will be better when Bo has all is own players. K State played Okla. very tough and Bill Snyder doesn't have any of his "own" players. Maybe our problems are coaching.

Posted by: Lee on 11/01/09 @ 2:23 pm:

Tom, you are correct Green did not "crash the car". Suh did.

Posted by: bo must go on 11/01/09 @ 5:36 pm:

tom had the perfect opp. to correct his mistakeof 12 years ago and hire gill. the excuse of we needed a defensive guy as head coach is pretty weak, i know charlie would have come back for 1 or 2 years to help out until we had a perm. d-coordinator. osborne's legacy will be tarnished forever because he couldn't pull the trigger when you know he really wanted to. here's hoping both ozzy and babybo are gone within 2 years.

Posted by: laxcoachdan on 11/01/09 @ 8:23 pm:

What is the deal with the running backs? Pick a couple of healthy runners, give them the ball several times each, and let them run. Good running backs get better the more carries they get. Just keep giving them the ball! I would imagine that our fifth, sixth and seventh string running backs were great HS backs, so put them to work. And finally, where are out fullbacks?

Posted by: Georgia Husker on 11/01/09 @ 8:39 pm:

Is Bill Snyder a great coach or what! He kind of strips away a lot of the excuses we've been hearing in Husker Nation. Even if we have to suffer through Watson's offensive play-calling and decision-making can't we at least find somebody who can coach the fine art of blocking?
And another thing, put some upper-body strength on these running backs. Dan Alexander, Ahman Green, etc make these guys look like distance runners.

Posted by: Calihusker on 11/01/09 @ 9:54 pm:

It is funny to hear all of you Couch Potatoes complain about the play calling by one of the most sought after offensive coordinators in the country. My guess is most of you have never put shoulder pads on let alone actually play the game. So do what you do best sit on the couch, drink your beer, eat your lays potatoe chips, text your friends about the bad coaching and tell your wife how much better you would be at play calling. Let us real fans watch the games and actually cheer our team on. WIN OR LOSE!

Posted by: KCHusker on 11/01/09 @ 10:29 pm:

Everyone is piling on Watson. While I agree the offensive strategy of "taking what they give" should be left out against teams like I-State and Baylor, we have a game coming up where we are going to have to be a little "cute" to move the ball. The screen play needs to be shelved. I can't recall it getting us more than 7 yards all year WHEN WE COMPLETE IT TO OUR GUY, but we have now given up 14 points and completely turned the momentum of two games trying it. One game we lost. Watson is probably gone at year end. Here's one fan really hoping that Barney Cotton goes with him. He was a soft player and he's a soft coach. We have the size, strength and speed on the Offensive line to push people off the ball. We do it well with the two tight-end, I-Back/Fullback set. Line it up and pound. OU has a good line, but our d-line should dominate their O-line. Pound the ball, get some first downs, run the clock and keep our D fresh, get the crown involved and we're going to bed happy in 6 days. Question isn't CAN they do it, question is WILL they have the stones to do it. GBR from KC!!!

Have a thought? Post it here

Screen Name:
Comments:

Please enter the letters as you see them from the picture above before submitting your comment.
If you have trouble reading the image click here for a new one.
   

Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.