LINCOLN — The chances of Chris Brooks catching a touchdown toss weren't incredibly high during the initial moments of a second-quarter goal-line pass play.
Brooks, lined up in the slot, was 4 yards into his route and two linebackers had instantly covered him up. The play didn't seemed to be designed for Brooks, either. There were at least four other receiving targets, and quarterback Zac Lee was fixated on Curenski Gilleylen.
But what transpired next was a quintessential portrayal of persistence paying off, an old adage that's beginning to define Brooks' senior season.
Brooks never quit working on that third-down play from the 4-yard line Saturday. He maneuvered his way past the linebackers and trotted along the back of the end zone, eventually catching his first touchdown of the season.
He finished with two career highs — three catches and 50 yards. But he proved that his hard-working approach in practice is carrying over to game days.
“I'm one of those guys (who's) more depended on,” Brooks said. “It feels good to be in that situation. I'm glad that Coach can close his eyes and know that I can get the job done.”
He has spent the past four years competing for his chance to contribute consistently.
Brooks, rated highly by several recruiting services in high school, has always been labeled as one of the team's most devoted practice players. But his on-the-field results had been minimal.
Brooks caught one pass as a sophomore, a 4-yarder in the season opener. He played in 11 games last year, finishing with two receptions.
But this year, Brooks has emerged as a reliable option.
One of his catches in the 55-0 win over Louisiana-Lafayette went for 24 yards on third down. Against Virginia Tech, no NU wide receiver had more than one reception except for Brooks, who finished with two 8-yard catches.
Through four games, Brooks has eight receptions, a total that ranks fifth among the Huskers and is three short of the leaders.
It seems as if Brooks may have figured things out. Maybe it's maturity, or maybe it's opportunity.
Brooks, though, is acting as if he has been expecting it for some time.
“That's what I'm supposed to do,” he said Saturday after the game. “Can't make too much of it. That's why I'm on scholarship. That's what they brought me here to do.”
It just took a while for Brooks to get his chance.
The St. Louis standout unintentionally grabbed the attention of Husker fans before he came to Lincoln. He had been nearly invisible on the box scores since.
But Brooks always made a positive impression in practice, exactly the reason why teammates, such as Lee, speak so highly of him. Lee said he is pleased that Brooks is getting rewarded.
“I know how hard he's worked,” Lee said. “I know how badly he wants to do well. I know how much this team means to him. It was good to see him succeed.”
Contact the writer:
402-473-9585, jon.nyatawa@owh.com
Copyright ©2010 Omaha World-Herald®. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, displayed or redistributed for any purpose without permission from the Omaha World-Herald.








Digg
Newsvine
del.icio.us
Reddit
Facebook
Twitter
RSS Feeds
5 Comments
Posted by: BigRedBlitz on 09/29/09 @ 10:27 am:
Brooks should be starting in place of Holt. Holt cost us the VT game by missing about 5 blocks that cost us first downs and a few that stalled drives likely would have gone for touchdowns if he'd made his blocks. Holt is not a Nebraska receiver. NU receivers like to block just as much as running routs. Brooks can make all the catches Holt makes and block. I hope the fact that Brooks was a captain last week and the more playing time is an indication this change is coming. They watch film, they know.
Posted by: Los Angeles Husker on 09/29/09 @ 2:45 pm:
Good for Brooks. This guy has been a team player from day one and never bailed on the team evening during his down times.
Has anyone else noticed that The Skers were completely dissed in the most recent polls?
Posted by: huskerfan79 on 09/29/09 @ 4:35 pm:
Brooks is the ultimate team player and I'm glad to see him finally getting on the field and taking full advantage of the opportunity. Good for him. As far as the claim to Holt missing blocks in the VT game, not sure I'd have to go back and look at the film. But he's not the reason we lost, that was a team effort as many mistakes were made by multiple players. Also nt sure if we were exactly "dissed" since we've only beaten 3 Sun Belt teams, but I did notice teams like USC moving up like 5 spots after beating Wash St??? Go figure...
Posted by: BigRedBlitz on 09/29/09 @ 9:01 pm:
huskerfan79, go back and watch any game, VT especially however, we'd have been in the end zone if Holt makes his blocks. Sure, there are lots of things that could have changed the outcome; the botched coverage, etc., and I know it sounds like I'm looking for a scapegoat, but if that was Peterson, we make 6, probably twice. Go back and look and I'd be surprised if you don't sway my way a little bit. USC getting bumped 5 spots is a crime. Iowa to 13? Miama gets crushed by VT and falls in front of us after we kicked them up and down the field all day and lost essentially on a hail mary? Cal falls in front of us after getting crushed by Oregon, a team with a loss and near miss to Purdue. Mizzou not even ranked in one poll, but Iowa is 13? The polls are whacked. Thing is, if we somehow managed to win out, we'd be in the mix. All the pretenders will lose again. Frankly, after seeing us play VT as well as 'bama; seeing what VT did to Miami and what 'bama did to Ark; not to mention how much worse we beat ULL than LSU, I think we're very possibly a top ten caliber team, and likely the most underrated team in the country.
Posted by: CB1Rulez on 10/01/09 @ 3:54 pm:
This article is music to my eyes - CB1 is DA MAN!