Today’s e-Edition

e edition

Metro Guide Online

Find a business

Category:
Location:


Zip Code:
Within  Miles of Zipcode

Omaha may end fireworks ban

By this time next year, Omahans may be able to purchase fireworks within the city's limits, according to a city official.

There has been movement in city government to bring Omaha's fireworks laws on par with state regulations, said Ron Gerard, a spokesman for Mayor Jim Suttle.

State law permits consumer fireworks to be sold between June 25 and July 4, with restrictions. The state regulates the types of fireworks that can be sold — they can't be hot or in flames when they hit the ground.

In Omaha, all fireworks sales are prohibited. Omahans go to neighboring communities such as Papillion, Bellevue, Ralston and La Vista to purchase fireworks — or to Missouri to get the types that aren't legal in Nebraska.

In the face of a tough economy and a city budget crisis, Omaha officials are considering allowing fireworks sales.

“If we could keep dollars here, why not?” Gerard said.

He said permitting fireworks sales also could help local nonprofits, who often sell fireworks as a fundraiser but are forced to go outside Omaha to do so.

Omaha's laws could become on par with the state's or be more restrictive, such as only allowing sales on July 4, Gerard said.

In addition to the talk about changing Omaha laws, at least one group would like to see state regulations changed as well.

The Platte Institute, a think tank that promotes limited government and individual rights, says Nebraska's strict laws don't make the state safer than Missouri, the closest state with less-stringent rules. And, the group says, the current laws hurt Nebraska's economy.

Missouri permits the sale of all fireworks approved by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Fireworks sold in Missouri that aren't available in Nebraska include bottle rockets, 500-gram aerial shells and some types of Roman candles and parachutes.

Nebraska's rule concerning flaming fireworks is necessary because the safety commission does not test every product approved for sale, said State Fire Marshal John Falgione.

Platte Institute editor Berk Brown said his group examined whether improved safety justified the sales tax revenue the state loses when Nebraskans purchase fireworks elsewhere.

Citing safety commission statistics, the institute's report says fireworks-related injuries in Nebraska rose to 147 in 2006, up from 61 in 1991, despite a declining trend nationally. In 2008, 140 fireworks-related injuries occurred in the state.

Nebraska reported one injury for every 11,564 residents, the report says, while Missouri had one injury for every 14,609 residents in 2006.

Such figures were easy to find because agencies keep track of fireworks accidents. But those numbers don't include unreported injuries, so actual figures could be higher, Falgione said.

Gerard said an extensive public safety campaign would accompany any change in Omaha's fireworks laws.

A local safety educator said she thought such an effort would be crucial.

“We would be providing a lot more safety tips and education,” said Kay Farrell, president and CEO of the National Safety Council's Greater Omaha chapter. She said the organization would use neighborhood associations, the media and other venues to raise awareness about fireworks safety.

Meanwhile, Brown said hard numbers on how many fireworks Nebraskans purchase in other states or how much revenue the state might be losing don't exist.

However, the institute's nonscientific study indicated that the number of public fireworks displays and licensed fireworks stands in the state has declined over the past five years, even as fireworks consumption has increased in the United States.

That led the institute to conclude that Nebraskans are buying fireworks elsewhere, and that has to be hurting the state's bottom line, Brown said.

In a check for this story, fireworks sellers in Rock Port, Mo., estimated that 30 percent to 90 percent of their customers were from out-of-state, notably Nebraska and Iowa. Out-of-state customers generally don't spend more than in-state buyers and often buy items that are also legal in Nebraska.

It is illegal for anyone except licensed distributors and jobbers to bring fireworks from another state into Nebraska.

But that doesn't stop blast enthusiasts. The Nebraska State Patrol set up vehicle checkpoints on the Nebraska-Missouri border Wednesday afternoon. Three citations were issued near Auburn, a patrol spokeswoman said.

Missouri fireworks sellers say business wouldn't suffer if Nebraska eased its laws.

Several managers said their reputation would keep customers coming. One said his wholesale business would benefit from such a move.

“We could sell even more into Nebraska,” said Jack Mayer, vice president at Hale Fireworks at Rock Port.

Don Bellino, owner of Bellino Fireworks in Papillion, said he loses some business to Missouri, but it doesn't have a big impact on his bottom line.

Nighttime aerial effects fireworks, such as artillery shells, are the top sellers and have become more popular in recent years, he said. For the most part, those varieties are available in Nebraska and Missouri.

In the past few years, the state fire marshal has approved double- and triple-break artillery shells for sale, which Falgione said has brought in additional sales tax revenues.

Brown said the injury statistics show that the state should approve even more items.

“I've always been under the impression that this excess regulation was to protect citizens,” he said. “Nebraskans aren't safer as a result of the regulations.”

Contact the writer:

444-3152, emily.babay@owh.com


Contact the Omaha World-Herald newsroom


Copyright ©2009 Omaha World-Herald®. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, displayed or redistributed for any purpose without permission from the Omaha World-Herald.

27 Comments

Posted by: captian howdy on 07/03/09 @ 5:54 am:

they never have enforced the ban,so why not sell them here..doesnt really matter though.i can go less than a mile and buy them anyway.

Posted by: PeaceAndQuiet on 07/03/09 @ 7:36 am:

The ban should not be removed. Safety concerns aside, there are too many people who shoot off fireworks (in defiance of the ban) for hours, well into the wee hours of the night. These people have absolutely no consideration for others. If you want fireworks, go see a professional display!

Posted by: iamevolved on 07/03/09 @ 8:18 am:

Here's a thought. Enforce the ban on the books. Neighborhood fireworks displays are dangerous at best and unneeded. Drink all day then light off explosives while kids run around barefoot. Great idea.

Posted by: iamevolved on 07/03/09 @ 8:34 am:

Furthermore, read this article right in the the OWH for more reasons why we don't need amateur fireworks displays: Fireworks touched off nightmare. http://www.omaha.com/article/20090703/NEWS01/707039951/1009

Posted by: Rick Flare on 07/03/09 @ 9:41 am:

They should stay illegal so in keeping with custom in Nebraska, you can break the law "a little bit" like drinking in Memeorial stadium or on the golf range, or people of stature and in the legal profession

Posted by: overtaxedresident on 07/03/09 @ 10:12 am:

Are we slow??? How many times have we chased away money making opportunities for our city/state to other communities because "we don't support those dollars". Wake up!!! You would take our money than have us give it to you willingly. When are we going to realize what other cities and states already know?

Posted by: Mike on 07/03/09 @ 10:51 am:

This is a great idea. Let's not go half way though. Make everything that is legal in Missouri legal here in Omaha. I love to blow things up!

Posted by: voice of reason on 07/03/09 @ 11:20 am:

The fact is... the existing ban is NOT enforced in any way. I am against the use of fireworks within the city myself, but if we're not going to enforce the law... you might as well get rid of it (perhaps even generate a little sales tax revenue from sales within the city limits as well).

Posted by: Think Tank Thinker on 07/03/09 @ 12:21 pm:

A think tank (also called a policy institute) is an organization, institute, corporation, or group that conducts RESEARCH and engages in advocacy in areas such as social policy, political strategy, economy, science or technology issues, industrial or business policies, or military advice. That is the definition of a think tank and an important and primary aspect of a think tank is RESEARCH. While I generally agree with most of the recommendations put forth by the Platte Institute, the fact remains that their proposals have been largely editorial in nature rather than research based to this point.

Posted by: Scott on 07/03/09 @ 12:35 pm:

There have always been too many personal rights violations in this country. A Governments job does not include protecting citizens from themselves. If this were the case, we need to ban hammers, nail guns, ladders, vehicles and tanning salons. Banning fireworks was always a stupid law, we'll get 'em where ever we can either way.

Posted by: Celebrate on 07/03/09 @ 12:58 pm:

The 4th of July is a fun time of year. Let people celebrate! Sure bad things can happen and have happened. But we take risks everyday of our life. Why do good and responsible people always have to suffer because irresponsible and stupid people do things wrong! If you want to celebrate with fireworks do it safely, if you don't no one will make you!

Posted by: scarp9603 on 07/03/09 @ 1:04 pm:

Give us the freedom to celebrate our freedom!

Posted by: luv thy neighbor on 07/03/09 @ 1:42 pm:

great
lets give adults dangerous fireworks after they have been dranking all day.
The police and sheriff departments do nothing about shooting them off illegally. As a matter of fact the police treat you like crap when you call to complain about it.
My neighborhood shoots fireworks all year around and nothing is done about it.
Always about the mighty dollar isn't it..

Posted by: Roy in Omaha on 07/03/09 @ 2:02 pm:

Laws that are universally ignored (and not enforced) are not good laws. The "ban" is ridiculous. Repeal it, now.

Posted by: PeaceAndQuiet on 07/03/09 @ 2:03 pm:

The ban is presumably enforced, but you have to report fireworks use. Police will not stop if they just see it happening.

Posted by: Kate on 07/03/09 @ 3:15 pm:

This would be great. Illegal or not half of the people in my area light fireworks weeks before the 4th. I myself have no issue driving the 20 odd minutes to the nearest firework stand but it would be nice if the money could go toward Omaha. Happy 4th everyone.

Posted by: Bob on 07/03/09 @ 4:04 pm:

Finally PROGRESS!

Looks at the facts:
1. You can drive 10 minutes, and get plenty of them.
2. Walk outside, right now. You will hear HUNDREDS of people who realize a Firework ban belongs in the 1900's.
3. MONEY! We need it. SO if people are gonna violate the ridiculous outdated rule, MAKE MONEY OFF IT.
4. This state fumbled a perfect chance to save and make money, Casinos, instead we chose to stay in the 1800's. The City of Omaha can demonstrate it's in the 2000's.
5. Peace and Quiet? MOVE TO THE COUNTRY! Don't live in a CITY and expect everyone to shut up. It's NOT REALISTIC.
6. It's a celebration, if you are such a downer that you can't enjoy celebrating the very freedom you enjoy, then you should look at yourself real hard.

Posted by: Tom on 07/03/09 @ 4:06 pm:

Omaha Tax Revenue Fireworks Sales = GOOD! Everyone violates the ridiculous rule anyway, benefit from it.

Posted by: travelpet on 07/03/09 @ 4:58 pm:

What ban? There are fireworks going on out here until well after midnight every night from June 15 until after Labor Day..and there is a police satellite office less than 3 blocks from here. What a joke?

Posted by: im here on 07/03/09 @ 5:16 pm:

i say pass the law, firework purchase has been going on for years anyway and nebraska can use the money.

Posted by: crnhsker_girl on 07/03/09 @ 8:36 pm:

Make Fire works legal, have adults drinking all day, kids running barefoot, then watch your Children's Hospital have epidemic proportion burns and lives changed forever. DO NOT LEGALIZE FIREWORKS! Think first about the safety of the CHILDREN --- if you were concerned adults then take your family to watch professionals do the show.!!!! Just like drowning in a pool, it just takes a second for a child to burn thier hand, or worse their face. And then, the adults would blame the city for legalizing FIREWORKS!!!

Posted by: nemajordude on 07/03/09 @ 9:37 pm:

Either enforce the ban or sell them within city limits. Personally I'm not in favor of legal fireworks but what we are doing now is a joke. Might as well bring in some revenue.

Posted by: Jay on 07/04/09 @ 5:57 pm:

You want to generate some revenue for the city? Enforce the current laws!! Slap a $250 fine on people breaking the fireworks ban. Over the last week of June & first week of July we'd make thousands of easy dollars each & every night. Of course, the police would have to actually get out of their air conditioned cruisers occasionally - but I'd wager Jim-Bob and his neighbors would think twice about lighting off their piles of Missouri shells at Midnight if they saw a few cops passing out tickets. We could even expand this radical idea to the rest of the year, like actually stopping red-light runners on a daily basis, or even pulling over a few dozen speeders daily. Nahhhhhhhh.

Posted by: realistic on 07/05/09 @ 1:34 pm:

I really doubt legalizing fireworks in Omaha itself would change the state's bottom line. People living in Omaha will buy their fireworks just 10 minutes away anyway. The only bottom line it would change is Omaha's.

As for everybody ranting and raving about the dangers, it's easy to pick on something flashy like fireworks. Yes, they are dangerous, but the risks involved drop dramatically with responsible use, just like everything else we enjoy that can be dangerous (alcohol, vehicles, guns, carnival rides, grills, swimming, boating, etc).

Posted by: Nathan on 07/06/09 @ 2:33 am:

Ya sure there are people out there who don't like fireworks and are safety fanatics, but if we have more saftey lessons in schools or on the news then let the ban pass. And of course a house will burn down like it does every year with firework dangers but we can try to prevent this from happen and celebrate what we love most about the fourth and that is to bring the family together and have a good time. Also this could make new jobs with building firework warehouses and having eymployes to boost Omahas economy and also tons of people buy fireworks from illegal states and really I see them everysingle year.

Posted by: Adam R. on 07/06/09 @ 3:05 pm:

The comments from the people opposed to lifting the ban are hilariously illogical. On the one hand, the gripe to no end about how mobs of people are shooting fireworks off nonstop. Then, they say "do not legalize fireworks . . . think of the CHILDREN!". Use your heads people! Yes, idiots fire them off far too soon before the 4th, far too long after, and far too late into the night. But the fact that mobs of people are ignoring the law demonstrates the futility of the law itself. Obviously the law does NO GOOD whatsoever. A tip of my hat to "voice of reason" - he's opposed to fireworks, but thinks to himself: "Hmmm, if my goal is to not have people using them, is the current ban working?" No - since it's NOT working, just legalize it, and make the tax revenue on it, instead of allowing our money to flow elsewhere. And don't tell me "enforce the ban!" - There is no way to do that, short of hiring thousands of new officers. A law that is overwhelmingly opposed cannot be enforced. Just look at how well the metric system has taken over since Congress passed it into law in the 70's. Go have a "litre" of beer, and chill out. Legalize the fireworks (and marijuana while you're at it - I'm opposed to marijuana use too, but the law currently does NOTHING to stop it, so just legalize it already).

Posted by: Hugh Jorgan on 07/06/09 @ 4:17 pm:

We are not a nation, state or city of communism or socialism (yet). Why not let us enjoy our freedoms. For god's sake, if people blow off a hand or a face, its probably rightly deserved. It's called thinning the heard. C'mon people!!

Have a thought? Post it here

Screen Name:
Comments:

Please enter the letters as you see them from the picture above before submitting your comment.
If you have trouble reading the image click here for a new one.
   

Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.