Today’s e-Edition

e edition

Metro Guide Online

Find a business

Category:
Location:


Zip Code:
Within  Miles of Zipcode

Generation gap gets wider

By Dane Stickney and Elliot Njus
WORLD-HERALD STAFF WRITERS

Jay Carlson loves his grandma, but the two have their differences.

He's a 22-year-old gay, atheist computer engineering student who not only voted for Barack Obama but also worked for the Democratic Party.

Grandma is in her 70s, attends church every Sunday and usually turns on her computer only to send e-mails, some of them chain messages that questioned Obama.

“She's the sweetest, kindest person ever,” said Carlson, a senior majoring in computer and electrical engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln. “But she's from a totally different generation, and we definitely look at the world in different ways.”

Tweeting and texting teens and twentysomethings increasingly are at odds with those 65 and older when it comes to topics such as technology, politics and religion. Those differences have created the biggest generation gap since the 1960s, according to a report released this week by the Pew Research Center.

Nearly 80 percent of those surveyed said there is a major schism between the values and mindsets of younger and older Americans. That's a bigger gap than in turbulent 1969, when 74 percent reported generational culture clashes over Vietnam, civil rights and women's liberation.

Today, both sides peg social values and morality as the biggest differences between those 30 and under and those 65 and older, according to the researchers. Older Americans placed more value on religion. Younger people tended to be more accepting of gay marriage and interracial relationships, and they also were overwhelmingly more likely to embrace technology and share their thoughts via text messaging and social networking Web sites.

None of those findings surprises Carlson.

His grandmother regularly attends and volunteers at church (Carlson knows she's Protestant, but don't ask him which denomination).

While she uses e-mail, she hardly ever surfs the Internet or uses a cell phone. Carlson spends hours a day on Facebook, debating on the Web site with friends about politics and other social issues. Those are the kind of thoughts his grandma would prefer to keep private.

The two have never discussed his sexual orientation or her political beliefs, but the different points of view are obvious. They don't argue, accepting that neither will change the other.

That lack of confrontation makes the current generation gap far different that the one in the 1960s, said Paul Taylor, director of the Pew Social and Demographic Trends Project. In the 1960s, younger people built a defiant counterculture. The current generation is more passive.

“Today, it's more of a general outlook, a different point of view, a general set of morals,” Taylor said.

If the younger, open-minded, more technologically adaptable generation keeps those traits as it ages, it could have major implications in coming decades, said Ilze Zigurs, a professor at the University of Nebraska at Omaha who studies the impact of technology on people and society.

Zigurs speaks from experience. The 61-year-old is unusually technologically savvy for her age because of her profession. She predicts that people like her won't be as uncommon in the future.

“Adaptability is one of the best traits we can have,” she said. “It will foster innovation and could potentially make big political issues such as health care reform or environmental decisions easier to digest.”

Young adults today skew more liberal because they have easier lives, said Ann Coco, a 26-year-old Omahan. People in her grandparents' generation had to work harder to survive and as a result value individualism.

“The thinking then was that no one should get a free ride,” she said. “We've been pampered a bit. We haven't had to work as hard.”

The politically independent Coco voted for the more liberal Obama. She's pretty certain her grandfather backed the more conservative John McCain.

The philosophical differences have their benefits and drawbacks, said Shannon Cary, a 28-year-old student at UNO.

Her generation tends to be more tolerant than older people, which she sees as a good thing. But she doesn't think young people value family as much, which is problematic, she said.

Libby Schumacher sure thinks young adults act differently compared to when she was growing up.

The 66-year-old plays piano at St. Leo Catholic Church, and she's noticed fewer young adults attending. She also fears that text messaging keeps youngsters from living in the moment. Her parents never would have allowed her to text while they talked to her.

Schumacher hopes people her age can stress to youngsters the importance of religion and family values. But she's willing to borrow from other generations, too. She has a cell phone, but she doesn't text, and she's impressed with how confident young adults are now.

“I'm just starting to rebel,” Schumacher said.

Carlson doesn't see the generation gap narrowing anytime soon. He and his 18-year-old brother, in fact, have their own gap.

The brother and his friends are more tech savvy — they debate news issues not only on Facebook but Twitter and other places. They organize online rallies and groups to back certain causes.

“They're on a whole different level,” Carlson said. “And they're only four years younger.”

World-Herald staff writer Michaela Saunders contributed to this report, which includes material from the Associated Press.

Contact the writers

444-1220, dane.stickney@owh.com or 444-1229, elliot.njus@owh.com


Contact the Omaha World-Herald newsroom


Copyright ©2009 Omaha World-Herald®. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, displayed or redistributed for any purpose without permission from the Omaha World-Herald.

14 Comments

Posted by: Istaraen on 07/02/09 @ 2:35 am:

This story really oversimplifies the socio-technical divide in this country: what about the mother who is texting during church, or the conservative college student Tweeting Bible verses? More to the point, President Obama isn't really hip and cool, he's just the choice of people with a certain set of values; Sen. McCain was the choice of others, and the embrace of technology really isn't so intimately linked as this story seems to imply it is. It was a good idea, but this story really wasn't that awesome.

Posted by: Alex S on 07/02/09 @ 4:07 am:

I may be middle aged, but I know that you don't send tweets on an iPhone through Safari. You use a dedicated app, like Tweetie or Twitterific. :)

Also, I kind of resent the idea that I supported Obama because I was pampered. I had serious concerns about McCain's competence. His VP pick drove them home.

Posted by: Genehbj on 07/02/09 @ 9:21 am:

I think this an interesting topic and even though it's brief it should lead to some interesting conversations.

Posted by: Ben on 07/02/09 @ 9:32 am:

I'm in my mid 20s, twitter is extremely annoying and I have never even been to the webpage. Watch CNN for half and hour and count the number of mentions of twitter, it will be around 8 times, no matter the program.

Posted by: JPB on 07/02/09 @ 9:33 am:

Conventionally, a true "generation gap" was defined as the relationship divide between parents and children; one generation. The inclusion of grandparents and even siblings into this discussion creates a skewed perspective.
Modern "technological advances" do more to widen the gap because personal communication is superficial. The more of an island we allow ourselves to become, the more difficult it is to have and maintain any type of meaningful relationships...with anyone.

Posted by: Bob on 07/02/09 @ 10:03 am:

Harder times are coming. We'll see how that impacts the younger, hip crowd. My kids are in some ways more conservative than I am.

Posted by: slade on 07/02/09 @ 10:04 am:

The first poster nailed it. Both facets of this story are worth writing about, but they deal with two relatively separate sets of issues. The way people communicate and how they view social, political and economic issues doesn't have a whole lot to do with using Twitter or their propensity to forward goofy right-wing chain-letters. Yes, the technological divide is important, but the more pressing issue seems to be less the generational split as opposed to the amount of access people from poor communities have in relation to richer ones. Furthermore, we should question what accounts for the belief that the demographic changes both in Omaha and the rest of the country seem to be conducive to more liberal practices. Again, this has less to do with age than it does with other factors.

Posted by: Adam on 07/02/09 @ 10:39 am:

I agree with both Istaren and slade. This story is WAY oversimplified. It takes a few examples and makes broad generalizations. Moreover, how does one even define "conservative" and "liberal" anymore? If someone is against abortion, concerned about climate change, pro-gun ownership, supports government health care, and isn't really worried about gay marriage: is that person a liberal or a conservative? It all depends on which person you ask, and which issue is most important to them.

Certainly, younger people generally tend to be more liberal (in the classic sense of the term) - and they grow more conservative as they get older, and gain more life experiences. However, I personally see many "generation X" people who are MUCH more conservative than their baby-boomer parents, and who truly believe that the baby boom generation irresponsibly led this country to the brink. On that front, both the WWII generation and the younger set agree: The boomer presidents utterly failed to capitalize on tremendous opporunities. That has more to do with a general sense of responsible behavior and leadership, than it does with political liberalism or conservatism.

An interesting starting point for discussion... but the article is mind-numbingly simplistic.

Posted by: -chet on 07/02/09 @ 10:48 am:

Twitter, like IMing, myspace, is a fad. It will find it's smaller place somewhere once the novelty wears off.

It feeds on the increasingly reliance of people to fee self important through mindless ramblings in a "published" format.

It scares the dickens out of me to know that purportedly mainstream, unbiased news outlets, (OWH, CNN, Fox, and even The Weather Channel) rely or facilitate this trash, and support the dissolution of thier journalistic standards. Its like a supertabloid.

I'm in my 20's, and rely on tech every day, but it won't be long before Facebooking and Twitting will pass, and be laughed at.

Posted by: Screen Name on 07/02/09 @ 10:52 am:

To attempt to link technology (or fear of) to the current President's election is absurd. While I will agree that there is a genuine generation gap between today's young professionals, it too will pass. Once these folks trend from abstract to concrete in their mentality, find a career (not a job), and settle into whatever they deem to be family life, their opinions will change. They always do.

President Obama was elected due to a perfect storm; A very unpopular President who dragged his party to the edge of existence, a financial meltdown unseen before by most voters, a very bad ticket as his opposition, and the current generation's desire to break the mold and show the world that we are not a backwards society.

2010 will be a good indicator of just how much Obama's coattails affected the current makeup of Congress. Generation gap or not, I believe that when it comes to the direction of the country, Americans will have seen what Obama, Reid, and Pelosi have done or have to offer, and will vote accordingly.

Posted by: Michelle on 07/02/09 @ 11:59 am:

Nothing a good Civil War couldn't fix.

Oh wait, we tried that once...

Posted by: SAJN on 07/02/09 @ 3:39 pm:

I couldn't care less how technology a president uses. It is his policies that are important. Unfortunately, a lot of folks think that makes him a better candidate. It is very sad how our society has lost it's moral compass.

Posted by: Glo on 07/02/09 @ 3:40 pm:

Well I can see where the gap comes in. But we have to consider that we do base alot of things on cell phones texting and emails.. when before you want to talk then you called someone or even went to there house to talk. Now a days its sad..My 16 year her and her friends text and keep in touch this way and my son he's 12 and well he textes me because there is no way he can call me at my job; can't get personal calls so if he needs something then he sends me a text. I guess my point is ya we all use cell phones, internet to keep in touch with the world and people like well my mom who would have been 67 this year well she didnt even like using the VCR. But all this generation gap it has always existed just we never gave that much importance to it. Nor did our parents let us overwhelm on it unless you were rich and had money for all this techno fancy items. Its to easy to get a cell phone, computer, now; back when it was much more money and families didnt want to get in debt to get the items; and just for your FYI I am in my early 30's.

Posted by: Anthony on 07/02/09 @ 10:50 pm:

There's something inconsistent I think. The teens/twenty's of the 60's -- turbulent with "Vietnam, civil rights, women's lib" & "young people [who] built a defiant counterculture" -- are today's sixty-ers. How can they frown on current change when they themselves roiled significant change back then? Unless Nebraska was exceptionally isolated from/immune to the rest of the nation, which I doubt.

Have a thought? Post it here

Screen Name:
Comments:

Please enter the letters as you see them from the picture above before submitting your comment.
If you have trouble reading the image click here for a new one.
   

Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.