Omaha, NE
H: 57°
L: 43°
53°
November 21, 2009
LOGIN | SIGNUP
Today’s e-Edition |
|
|
|
Creighton could play at Rosenblatt in 2011, Athletic Director Bruce Rasmussen said. “I don’t think anyone is in favor of tearing down Rosenblatt after the last pitch of the Royals’ season next year. I think everyone is saying let’s not be in a hurry."
JEFF BEIERMANN/THE WORLD-HERALD
Keep the wrecking ball on hold.
Rosenblatt Stadium’s demise probably won’t come as swiftly as first thought. In fact, Creighton might play its 2011 baseball schedule at Rosenblatt.
“It’s been discussed,’’ Athletic Director Bruce Rasmussen said. “I don’t think anyone is in favor of tearing down Rosenblatt after the last pitch of the Royals’ season next year. I think everyone is saying let’s not be in a hurry.
“Rosenblatt is a nice insurance policy in case something happens.’’
Creighton is negotiating with the City of Omaha and MECA to play its baseball games at the downtown stadium, which is scheduled for completion in time for the 2011 College World Series. The stadium is expected to be open for part of college baseball’s regular season that year.
Rasmussen said that while no agreement has been reached, he anticipates that something will be decided this summer.
“We haven’t made any progress the last couple of months, nor did we expect to,’’ Rasmussen said. “We’ve all been involved in taking care of this year’s College World Series. That includes the NCAA, MECA, the city and Creighton. “I anticipate now that we’ve gotten past the Series, something will be done soon. We are not in a panic because we don’t have a written agreement. We’re still two years away from playing there.’’
And if the new downtown stadium isn’t completed in time for Creighton’s season in the spring of 2011, Creighton coach Ed Servais said, Rosenblatt would make for a fine alternative. In fact, the Jays wouldn’t mind playing some games that spring at both Rosenblatt and the new stadium.
“From all indications, the new stadium will be done,’’ Servais said. “Hopefully we’ll have a chance to play a game or two there in 2011. But they’re going to have to maintain Rosenblatt for the spring of 2011, and hopefully we can help with that by getting out there and playing.’’
Creighton has played a portion of its schedule at Rosenblatt in recent seasons. The Bluejays played nine games there this season, and two — including their annual May meeting with Nebraska — were canceled because of the weather.
Creighton plays the rest of its home games at its on-campus sports complex.
One drawback to playing at Rosenblatt or the new downtown stadium is that the size of the facility dwarfs the turnout for Creighton games. Rosenblatt seats more than 23,000 in its present configuration. The new stadium’s capacity will exceed 24,000.
Creighton averaged 791 for its home games this season and about 1,500 for its games at Rosenblatt.
“I think in a perfect world, you wouldn’t play in a 24,000- or 25,000-seat stadium,’’ Servais said. “But I always try to look at the positives and the negatives, and the positives far outweigh any of the negatives of playing in the new stadium.
“It’s not 50-50. It’s not even close. Sure, if we have 2,500 people at a game, it’s going to appear that no one is there. But to be able to bring a recruit into that facility, to play our games there, that’s going to be nothing but positive.’’
Another plus if Creighton does move into the new stadium is that the school might have a chance to host the Missouri Valley Conference tournament. Wichita State has hosted the tournament 20 of the past 27 seasons.
“The new stadium gives us some viable options that we can really get excited about,’’ Servais said. “We are determined to move the program forward. There is talk about us hosting the conference tournament in the very near future.
“That would be a huge step for Creighton baseball if we could get into the mix. I think we have a shot. It would let folks know in our league and in the Midwest that Creighton is continually moving its program forward.’’
Contact the writer:
679-2298, steve.pivovar@owh.com
Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.
12 Comments
Posted by: TKB on 07/01/09 @ 10:16 am:
Can't wait to see the new CWS stadium vacant for 50 weeks per year.
Posted by: Guido on 07/01/09 @ 11:09 am:
Don't you just love the optimism of some people? Some people are so narrow minded that they can see through a key hole with both eyes.
MECA has been very proactive in attracting events to the Qwest Center. I believe that under their direction, we'll see some pretty good outdoor concerts scheduled for TD Ameritrade Park that othertwise wouldn't come to Omaha. I'd also like to see the opportunity for the some high school teams to play some baseball games there. A bid for the state baseball tournament would be nice.
Posted by: metoo on 07/01/09 @ 11:56 am:
Can the city pay for a giant house for me if I promise to use it only two weeks each year?
Posted by: louie on 07/01/09 @ 3:01 pm:
Rosenblatt is a dump. Sure it has history, but so did Yankee Stadium -- and I believe it was torn down.
I can't wait to watch the CWS on national tv (for 2 weeks) with the Omaha riverfront, awesome pedestrian bridge, or Omaha skyline as a backdrop. Right now at Rosenblatt, all the tv audience sees about Omaha is I-80 or the Holidome/Holiday Inn looking dome in the background -- sweet.
The critics who are now complaining about the new baseball stadium are the same people who complained (while the Qwest Center was being built) that the Civic was good enough. They also complained about the West Dodge Expressway, the pedestrian bridge, the interstate system, etc... I'm sure there were people in Seattle that complained that the Space Needle was a waste of money, in St Louis that the Arch was a waste, etc... But now these cities have recognizable landmarks.
Posted by: Pizza on 07/01/09 @ 3:33 pm:
I would be surprised if the NCAA lets MECA schedule anything on the field, beyond a Creighton game or two, before the CWS. They won't want to risk the playing surface not being in the best condition it can be in for their games. Then, that means there's really only a short window of time to make any money using the field on other events--you can't consistently damage a field with events like concerts and expect it to keep it's shape. It will be difficult to have enough events there to make any money (especially if there's not another team) and keep the field in the condition the NCAA and the coaches expect.
Posted by: blahblah on 07/01/09 @ 3:39 pm:
Sure, if your house will inject upwards of $40,000,000 into the local economy for those two weeks each and every year.
Posted by: JG on 07/01/09 @ 3:55 pm:
What's the story with the Omaha Royals for the upcoming years? Will they still be around, and where will they play? (I live out-of-state)
Posted by: simon on 07/01/09 @ 4:07 pm:
I seem to remember all the cryin' when the Quest center was being talked about. Whose cryin' now! Wake up people. You have to pay to play.........
Posted by: cr227 on 07/01/09 @ 5:14 pm:
Rosenblatt is not a very nice stadium. Parking and entertainment around it was a joke, and a huge pain every single year. The zoo is bursting at the seams for space. I cannot wait for the city to FINALLY move on from that old-school space idea it outgrew years ago!
Not only that, this secured 25 years with the NCAA - we've never had that sort of contract. Take a look at the reports on how much money the CWS brings in every year and tell me this deal did not make perfect sense financially. Add in the zoo, and the chances of even more tourism with a larger and better zoo, and it makes perfect sense.
What's ridiculous is the Royals building a new stadium in the middle of no where that has a series of hypotheticals paying for it. Glad I don't live in Sarpy county!!! I know I won't attend any more Royals games now that I'd have to drive 45 minutes to get there...
Posted by: whatever on 07/01/09 @ 5:24 pm:
If the CWS really injects $40,000,000 into the local economy then the business community should pay for the new stadium.
Posted by: baseball fan on 07/01/09 @ 8:01 pm:
How can a team that has had a losing record for ten years dictate what they want? Not much hope for a winning season in the near future!!
Posted by: True Baseball Fan on 07/01/09 @ 11:12 pm:
A losing record for ten years? 2008 (37-21); 2007 (45-16); 2006 (31-21); 2005 (48-17); 2004 (35-24). How exactly were these losing years?