Today’s e-Edition

e edition

Metro Guide Online

Find a business

Category:
Location:


Zip Code:
Within  Miles of Zipcode

City officials told: Don't raise taxes

Several Omaha business leaders and elected officials say they would prefer additional cuts in city services over higher taxes as a solution to the city's budget crisis.

Few offered specific cuts, though.

One who did was Richard Bell, chairman of HDR Inc., who said Saturday he wouldn't mind if the city stopped picking up yard waste — an idea being considered by Mayor Jim Suttle and which would save $4 million in the 2010 city budget.

“Certainly, I don't like taxes,” Bell said. “Nobody does.”

Bell is a member of the Greater Omaha Chamber of Commerce board of directors. Suttle met with the board Friday to outline his proposals for addressing a $5 million shortfall in the current budget and a projected $11 million gap in next year's budget.

The city's budget problems are due for the most part to lower-than-anticipated revenue during a national recession — especially sales tax receipts, which are expected to drop for the first time this year.

Suttle also has met with City Council members to go over the budget and tax matters.

Suttle's ideas include a property tax increase and two new taxes — a 2 percent tax on entertainment, including restaurants and bars, and an occupation tax that would collect $2 a month from everyone who works in Omaha and a equal amount from their employers.

Suttle has not decided for certain that higher taxes are necessary, but city officials say the alternative could be painful cuts in services such as closing library branches, eliminating police recruit classes and dropping yard waste collections. The mayor also is looking for budget savings by planning to negotiate a wage freeze with city employee unions.

With a total of $14 million already being slashed from the 2009 budget, city officials say there might not be much left to cut. But Councilman Chuck Sigerson was unconvinced Saturday.

“Are we to the point where there's nothing left?” he asked. “Maybe we should be concentrating on cutting spending and not throw in the towel and raise taxes.”

While Sigerson didn't say what should be put on the chopping block, he does favor seeking legislative and voter approval to raise the city's sales tax rate — a move that would help shore up the budget and address other major financial issues: the $500 million shortfall in the police and fire pension fund and the debt from the Qwest Center Omaha.

Councilman Pete Festersen said the city needs to get through the 2009 and 2010 budget problems without a tax hike. “We may have to go without some services for a time,” he said.

Festersen also supports freezing all city wages this year and next.

Business owners in the past have opposed entertainment and occupation taxes.

Nebraska Furniture Mart Vice President Bob Batt said the city needs to skip the tax increases and instead hold off on building projects until the economy turns around.

“They say they are making hard choices but I have yet to see that,” he said. “They need a review of what the city is involved in and decide what they can live without at this present time.”

Bell, of HDR, said he'd rather have the city charge a monthly garbage fee instead of raise his property taxes.

“Omaha is one of the few major cities in the country that doesn't charge a garbage fee,” he said. “I've wondered about that one for 30 years now.”

Contact the writer:

444-3100, maggie.obrien@owh.com


Contact the Omaha World-Herald newsroom


Copyright ©2009 Omaha World-Herald®. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, displayed or redistributed for any purpose without permission from the Omaha World-Herald.

15 Comments

Posted by: Walt on 06/21/09 @ 8:59 am:

Definitely we don't need more taxes. The city should cut out and or scrap unnecessary projects like the water park at Zorinsky lake. Raising taxes will just mean that individuals and businesses will just be moving out of Omaha to other city's and states where taxes and lower and services are better. Were only in this predicament because of uncontrolled spending, such was the Qwest center. the new stadium, wage hikes, annexing Elkhorn. etc.

Posted by: Dennis on 06/21/09 @ 9:27 am:

Stop using City vehicles for personnal use and limit driving them as we have to when our budget is strpped. Stop giving Mayor staff raises and stop needless spending by city staff including the Mayor and his staff. Cut city park grass every two weeks instead of every week. Have city and county law enforcement offficers park their vehicles for one hour and walk the neighborhoods and get to know the people in that area or use a less costly mode of transportation for that hour.

There are ways to cutthe expenses that would not really hurt the people of Omaha so you would not have to add taxes to them. We are one of the most tax state in the country as it is.

Posted by: Jer on 06/21/09 @ 11:37 am:

Start paying for trash pick up

Posted by: Sam on 06/21/09 @ 11:49 am:

I don't support raising taxes of any kind because we are already over-taxed. I don't hear anyone mentioning layoffs of city employees as part of the budget-cutting process. Layoffs are one way the private sector cuts expenses during tough times and perhaps the city should be doing this too. I think for now city officials should continue making budget cuts because we are now seeing some signs the economy may be starting to improve and perhaps things will get better in the not-to-distant future.

Posted by: Watson on 06/21/09 @ 12:27 pm:

Those advocating stopping yard waste pick-up have got to be 'tone deaf' ----or rich enough to hire someone
else to do all their yard work. I would not be against a 10 million dollar annual tax levied on the Chamber of Commerce to help (in a small way) citizens deal with the advocacy of extremely high cost civic projects with a very low return. Those who hyped the super budget busting projects should step up to the plate and open their wallets. The public was told the new arena/convention center would not result in taxes, now we are doing the losing new baseball stadium, etc.

Posted by: Tony on 06/21/09 @ 1:43 pm:

Every family in Omaha KNOWS how to cut their own expenses because we've all had to do it. People have moved out of Omaha (and Nebraska) because of our present taxes.
The city needs to make the same extreme cuts that we've all had to!

Posted by: Ferd Berfahl on 06/21/09 @ 4:58 pm:

Let the city start by getting out of the trash business altogether, not just yard waste.
Let's give that business back to the companies that had it taken away from them in the first place, the independent trash haulers of the area.
Every time the city annexes an area, they put a burden on these businesses by taking work away from them.

Posted by: Charles on 06/21/09 @ 11:16 pm:

What is the best choice for Omaha citizens? I think most would like to see Omaha keep good parks, increased library services, streets repaired. Take care of what we have. Qwest, river front developement, and now a new baseball stadium are too costly to the city and for citizen use. How often can the average joe drop enough cash to go to see a show at Qwest, pay parking, and go out to eat at a restaurant in the Old Market on a Saturday night? Forget about the baseball stadium and get your feet on the ground, Omaha leaders.

Posted by: non-omahan on 06/22/09 @ 8:29 am:

Wouldn't an occupation tax be taxation without representation for those who don't live in Omaha, but come there to work? Doesn't anybody else see what's wrong with that logic?

Posted by: Lincolnite on 06/22/09 @ 9:32 am:

Here in Lincoln we pay (on average) about $17 for once a week trash pickup. This doesn't included yard waste (additional $3 a month) or the rental of trash containers (additional $2 a month each).

So, if you're used to having it paid for with your city budget consider a $23 per month tax increase! Wow, that would be quite a bit in your fine city! Be careful of what you wish for, big brother...

Posted by: Sue on 06/22/09 @ 10:40 am:

Gesh...the people of Omaha don't even pay for their own yard pick up? That is crazy! We in Lincoln have to!

Posted by: Omahan on 06/22/09 @ 2:25 pm:

Of course we pay for our yard pick up with the taxes we pay. We pay taxes in return for services; our taxes are not a gift to the City. Are they going to tax me for a service and then make me pay for it a second time privately?

Posted by: Irate on 06/22/09 @ 8:20 pm:

We moved to Mississippi and paid $9.95 per month for twice a week trash pick up and they took EVERYTHING. Moved to Missouri and now pay $14.00 for once a week pick up and no yard waste or recyclables. You have to take all yard waste to a central location and any recyclables to specified places. I'll take Omaha's service any day!

Posted by: workin hard on 06/23/09 @ 8:19 am:

Layoffs could happen in the city but comparing it to the private sector is bogus. When the private sector is going well they hire at will. Getting more staff in most City departments takes forever, and usually only happens years after they are justified. As a result, there usually arent a lot of people they can afford to lose. Just remember, it all means less service to citizens, so don't whine when that happens either.

Posted by: Former Omahan on 06/23/09 @ 12:35 pm:

My husband and I were planning to build a home in Omaha (had completed the plans and ready to sign papers) untill we were given the approximate figure for our taxes. Man, did that put a stop on the "new" home. There is no way we are going to pay over $6000 for property taxes. That is insane! We are now building in another state with much much cheaper taxes and more and better services. Omaha, you lost out on a new resident which in turn a loss of tax income. The city needs to reduce the big wigs pay and stop living above the city's means. The citizens have reduced their spending to stay within their means...city needs to follow the same steps.

Have a thought? Post it here

Screen Name:
Comments:

Please enter the letters as you see them from the picture above before submitting your comment.
If you have trouble reading the image click here for a new one.
   

Please note by clicking on "Post" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.